Nebulasaurus
1 min readAug 29, 2022

--

I see people say this a lot, but I always have a hard time understanding it. Of course, an abortion ban ultimately does result in a reduction in women's freedom - but is the end goal for banning abortion really specifically to limit women's freedom? Or is that just a side-effect of some other goal?

It just seems hard to believe that that is the goal in itself. It's not intuitive to me that people really want to control women as a goal in itself. And after all, a third of anti-choicers are women (gallup poll: https://news.gallup.com/poll/244709/pro-choice-pro-life-2018-demographic-tables.aspx), which, while obviously a minority, is a significant chunk.

For the record. I am staunchly pro-choice. But I also think that it'll be easier to refute anti-choicers' arguments if we have an accurate understanding of their motivations. And I'm just not sure that "the desire to control women" is really the true reason. Can you offer actual evidence of that, or is it just speculation?

--

--

Nebulasaurus
Nebulasaurus

Written by Nebulasaurus

I think most people argue for what they want to believe, rather than for what best describes reality. And I think that is very detrimental to us getting along.

No responses yet